response3.html????????ğ´}Š`´}Š`ŭK Response Tsk, tsk, tsk. Someone's not reading the church doctrine close enough. You miss the crucial difference between apathy and the true path of least resistance. What's more effort: going to church or sitting at home reading a book? Going to church, obviously. What I'm calling for is not the namby-pamby acceptance of mainstream America, but a true, hardcore, full-on LACK OF EFFORT. Wading through all that doctrine, going to sermons, fighting in holy wars--who needs it? One of the benefits of this church is that the entire philosophy can be swallowed in 3 easy-to-read, hastily-written HTML docs, leaving a lot more time for sitting around and FIGURING SHIT OUT without the focus of an organized language. Is that not reality? Give me a break. The universe as an ordered, rational place is a judeo-christian pipe dream that doesn't hold up to five minutes of "real-world" experience. Might it possibly be that sitting around quietly seems unreal because we've had the pace of our lives racheted up to serve a machine that we created but no longer control, an eletroshock dildo in our collective anuses, a grinning Ronald McDonald whipmaster? Is this the way it should be or just the thing we should be trying to destroy? Questions, questions. So many questions. As I said, the church of least resistance is not an end--it is a path, a way. So many people jump into action without consideration; so many people run around not thinking about what they're doing. The church professes inaction which will LEAD to action, which will LEAD to effort. But the right kind of effort. That's the key.
Back